Can't you see the difference between "lead engineer" and "contributor"?

abc@home：Can't you see the difference between "lead engineer" and "contributor"?回到原帖

就算是ben 现在还是lead engineer.lead engineer只是contributor的一种。作为lead engineer之后，是不是所有行为都代表mozilla呢？是不是美国总统在撒尿就代表美国在撒尿，这么简单的逻辑关系都理不清吗？真真是别有用心那！

退一步讲，如果该blog是官方blog，官方也会在这个blog上注明官方立场，而不用在别的场合补充。这就充分表明了，该blog是属于ben的私人blog,只不过host在了这个网站而已。看来M＄的枪手有时候也傻得够可爱的。

Gee!

Tell us when did the US president piss in front of the public.

winyong：

别的不说，cracker不是研究这个的。那是hacker回到原帖

这个……其实真正的hacker也不是研究这个的。照我说，这个应该算spammer或者slasher(借用一下Diablo)

在Open Source的世界里有谁真正关心过，编写Linux核心的 Leader 到底是在哪一间企业工作的咧

Linus大概还在tansmeta工作。
其实Open Source并不代表没有版权，不尊重版权。
相反，GPL是保护原始作者的。比如上次的i18n小组和Mozilla中国的矛盾，很明显就是不尊重对方的劳动……违反了GPL。

……比如上次的i18n小组和Mozilla中国的矛盾，很明显就是不尊重对方的劳动……违反了GPL。

？？i18n小组是指哪里？
目前负责Mozilla简体中文化的主要人员已经与Mozilla中国挂钩。

文少华以前就是i18n的。现在的kde也是他们的杰作。

Linus大概还在tansmeta工作。

已经去 OSDL 全职开发 Linux 内核不短时间了。

I agree the blogs hosted at mozillazine.org can not be treated as "official Mozilla press site". Because it is simply not.

abc@home：Gee!

Tell us when did the US president piss in front of the public.回到原帖

在不在公共场合不是这种问题的焦点，只要换个例子就行了。美利坚总统在公共场合吃饭。

orizng：I agree the blogs hosted at mozillazine.org can not be treated as "official Mozilla press site". Because it is simply not.回到原帖

我也是这么认为的。

nighttalker：
这个我很好奇，但是我没有查到，你不妨列一下详细地址，谢。
对于mozilla开发人员和netscape的关系，作为一个ns的fans我自然也不喜欢他们职责NS，但是我对他们的做法也理解，我读过Asa和Blake Ross的两篇文章，其中blake的就叫做“现在的NS已经不是过去的NS了”。１０年前的网景是创新的代名词，现在的网景则在AOL的商业枷锁下沦落为傀儡，现在Mozilla的很多人员原先都在网景工作，对于NS感情不是那么简单可以描述的。对于AOL对NS的Torture他们无法容忍，认为AOL在侮辱internet最具创新的品牌（btw,我很支持这个观点。)回到原帖

嗯，对于BEN的行为我也表示理解，但对NS我还是支持的。这只是内部的技术矛盾。这种矛盾和与M＄的矛盾是天壤之别。

...
这个我很好奇，但是我没有查到，你不妨列一下详细地址，谢。
...

Oops! Should be the inquirer. Here's the link:
http://www.theinquirer.net/?article=23427

As I mentioned, and you can read in the above link, Mozilla had already clarified that Ben was no longer its employee before that instance

But interestingly Ben is still the "lead engineer of mozilla firefox" and continues to talk about the inside development of firefox in his "personal" blog hosted by mozillazine.

If that's meant by "open source", more power to ya.

well, Mozilla.org only said "Ben is currently not employed by Mozilla". which is true.
That means "what Ben said is not an official opinion from mozilla.org", which i agree.
I must say, privatey, on their own blogs, many Mozilla.org guys show the disappointed attitude towards today's NS, so there is no surprise they dont like the new NS8, but as a developer for open-source mozilla.org, they can not force other NS fans (like me) to agree with them on this. And they are not seeking people to agree with them neither, so I see no problem here.
Here is the fact, i simply dont think they hate NS just because NS is producing the same products as they do, i would rather describe that attitude as "deeply disappointed towards the degradation of their be-loved brand".