阅读:16414回复:83
Mozilla称火狐新引擎快于谷歌Chrome
http://tech.sina.com.cn/i/2008-09-05/13382438615.shtml
新浪科技讯 北京时间9月5日消息,据国外媒体报道,谷歌Chrome浏览器最引以为豪的是采用了高性能JavaScript虚拟机V8,但Mozilla日前却表示,下一代火狐(Firefox)浏览器的JavaScript引擎性能将超越V8。 因为采用了V8引擎,谷歌Chrome在加载JavaScript应用时的速度最快,超越了火狐和IE。但Mozilla日前表示,下一代火狐将使用新的JavaScript引擎“TraceMonkey”。TraceMonkey将提供前所未有的JavaScript性能,预计Firefox 3.1就会采用该引擎。 据Mozilla测试结果显示,如果火狐使用TraceMonkey引擎,谷歌Chrome在Windows XP下比火狐慢28%,在Windows Vista下比火狐慢16%。 尽管如此,Mozilla首席技术官布兰登·艾奇(Brendan Eich)还是对谷歌V8引擎大加赞赏。他说:“V8是一款不错的JavaScript引擎,尤其是其多线程设计理念。”(李明) |
|
1楼#
发布于:2008-09-08 11:35
方版最近挺偏向ff的嘛。
p.s.啥时候换头像了? |
|
2楼#
发布于:2008-09-08 11:35
2008/9/7 的Firefox 3.1b1pre,JavaScript 测试,只有一项测试落后于 Chrome,整体只落后一点了。要是将剩下的一项再改进,就超过 Chrome 了。
|
|
3楼#
发布于:2008-09-08 11:35
很好,很好.有竞争才有进步.
|
|
|
4楼#
发布于:2008-09-08 11:35
今天的NB测试,两者差距确实不大了,dell optiplex 270
PD 2.80 256M 测试不能算很严格,都是在正常强度浏览下(打开网页solidot,登陆论坛CU)的测试 chrome 1798(得分2898) http://www2.webkit.org/perf/sunspider-0 ... sults.html?{%223d-cube%22:[90,49,61,50,57],%223d-morph%22:[217,81,74,87,74],%223d-raytrace%22:[78,67,69,81,74],%22access-binary-trees%22:[11,8,10,8,10],%22access-fannkuch%22:[65,48,46,42,40],%22access-nbody%22:[48,48,70,44,64],%22access-nsieve%22:[28,30,31,28,30],%22bitops-3bit-bits-in-byte%22:[6,8,9,7,7],%22bitops-bits-in-byte%22:[15,16,16,14,13],%22bitops-bitwise-and%22:[24,23,25,24,24],%22bitops-nsieve-bits%22:[42,53,50,47,55],%22controlflow-recursive%22:[5,4,5,5,4],%22crypto-aes%22:[51,41,31,40,35],%22crypto-md5%22:[43,34,37,32,29],%22crypto-sha1%22:[33,30,27,48,27],%22date-format-tofte%22:[359,309,314,344,278],%22date-format-xparb%22:[194,201,216,203,195],%22math-cordic%22:[288,112,130,115,112],%22math-partial-sums%22:[78,78,77,79,66],%22math-spectral-norm%22:[26,22,25,25,24],%22regexp-dna%22:[577,577,678,539,528],%22string-base64%22:[113,112,90,110,105],%22string-fasta%22:[80,89,84,80,87],%22string-tagcloud%22:[337,263,241,253,274],%22string-unpack-code%22:[380,379,321,314,323],%22string-validate-input%22:[166,144,138,135,147]} firefox 0907032646 jit.chrome:on,jit.content:on(得分2973) http://www2.webkit.org/perf/sunspider-0 ... sults.html?{%223d-cube%22:[96,91,93,93,92],%223d-morph%22:[59,66,59,63,59],%223d-raytrace%22:[136,153,123,149,124],%22access-binary-trees%22:[92,116,75,101,76],%22access-fannkuch%22:[234,386,172,170,172],%22access-nbody%22:[79,78,68,66,67],%22access-nsieve%22:[16,28,25,25,24],%22bitops-3bit-bits-in-byte%22:[6,2,3,2,2],%22bitops-bits-in-byte%22:[28,14,14,15,15],%22bitops-bitwise-and%22:[13,9,8,9,8],%22bitops-nsieve-bits%22:[47,44,43,44,46],%22controlflow-recursive%22:[78,64,59,58,59],%22crypto-aes%22:[66,71,67,66,67],%22crypto-md5%22:[53,62,51,51,50],%22crypto-sha1%22:[20,110,21,20,20],%22date-format-tofte%22:[259,305,223,223,306],%22date-format-xparb%22:[183,176,169,173,175],%22math-cordic%22:[146,73,69,67,69],%22math-partial-sums%22:[34,35,32,32,35],%22math-spectral-norm%22:[16,17,14,14,15],%22regexp-dna%22:[386,442,379,380,384],%22string-base64%22:[26,27,26,26,26],%22string-fasta%22:[143,150,137,144,138],%22string-tagcloud%22:[208,211,202,209,227],%22string-unpack-code%22:[504,447,452,441,459],%22string-validate-input%22:[136,132,133,135,288]} |
|
|
5楼#
发布于:2008-09-08 11:35
但是jstimetest的反映有点过激
FF 994ms chrome 54ms |
|
|
6楼#
发布于:2008-09-08 11:35
在我的机器上,FF和GC差不多了
|
|
|
7楼#
发布于:2008-09-08 11:35
V8。。。还W12呢。。。。
|
|
8楼#
发布于:2008-09-08 11:35
FF3.01其实已经是上啦一个质的台阶 希望他的3.1更能有好的发挥
|
|
9楼#
发布于:2008-09-08 11:35
尤其是其多线程设计理念 高潮用的是多进程设计理念…………Firefox 4将试图实现多线程。 |
|
|
10楼#
发布于:2008-09-08 11:35
|
|
|
11楼#
发布于:2008-09-08 11:35
感谢谷歌推出浏览器 要不其他的浏览器出新的动力会减弱很多啊 应该说最近推出的浏览器每一个都有大幅度的改善啊
|
|
12楼#
发布于:2008-09-08 11:35
我是没看到高潮用的是多线程,如果是多线程的话,一个chrome.exe进程就够了。
TraceMonkey倒是一个firefox.exe,但是一假死/崩溃,还是全部遭殃。 |
|
|
13楼#
发布于:2008-09-08 11:35
|
|
|
14楼#
发布于:2008-09-08 11:35
Firefox不是Gecko吗?现在才1.9 不知道有没有2.0了。
|
|
|
上一页
下一页